info@woodslane.com.au
Contact us on (02) 8445 2300
For all customer service and order enquiries

WOODSLANE

Popular Subjects

Woodslane Online Catalogues

9781498579988 Add to Cart Academic Inspection Copy

Toward a Directionalist Theory of Space

On Going Nowhere
Description
Author
Biography
Table of
Contents
Reviews
Google
Preview
In Toward a Directionalist Theory of Space: On Going Nowhere, H. Scott Hestevold formulates a new relationalist theory of space by appealing to the view that the universe is directioned in the sense that there exist directional relations-a class of spatial relations that Leibniz overlooked. Extending the directionalist/relationalist theory of space to the problem of when it is that discrete objects compose a whole, Hestevold revisits his answer to the Special Composition Question. He also uses the directionalist/relationalist theory to formulate reductivist theories of boundaries and holes-theories that may allow one to resist the view that boundaries and holes are ontologically parasitic entities. Finally, he explores directionalism/relationalism vis-a-vis spacetime. After noting findings of modern physics that favor substantivalist spacetime and then developing metaphysical concerns that favor instead directionalist/relationalist spacetime, Hestevold notes the ontological benefit of endorsing spatiotemporal directional relations even if spacetime substantivalism is the winning theory.
H. Scott Hestevold is professor emeritus of philosophy at The University of Alabama.
PrefaceChapter 1: The Map to Nowhere and Beyond Chapter 2: Spatial Directionalism Chapter 3: A Directionalist Theory of Space Chapter 4: Defending Spacelessness Chapter 5: The Special Composition Question Revisited Chapter 6: Is the Road to Nowhere Without Boundaries and Holes? Chapter 7: Is Modern Physics a Roadblock to Going Nowhere? Bibliography
"Hestevold's book is a sophisticated, well-informed, and original treatment of thorny issues in analytic metaphysics. He grounds his discussion of space and directionality in the classic debate between Newton and Leibniz, but deftly takes it into the contemporary relativistic understanding of spacetime, with much to say about composition, persistence, continuity, and dependent particulars along the way. " -- Steven D. Hales, Bloomsburg University
Google Preview content