In this radical critique of his own academic speciality, biblical scholar Hector Avalos calls for an end to biblical studies as we know them. He outlines two main arguments for this surprising conclusion. First, academic biblical scholarship has clearly succeeded in showing that the ancient civilisation that produced the Bible held beliefs about the origin, nature, and purpose of the world and humanity that are fundamentally opposed to the views of modern society. The Bible is thus largely irrelevant to the needs and concerns of contemporary human beings. Second, Avalos criticises his colleagues for applying a variety of flawed and specious techniques aimed at maintaining the illusion that the Bible is still relevant in today's world. In effect, he accuses his profession of being more concerned about its self-preservation than about giving an honest account of its own findings to the general public and faith communities. Dividing his study into two parts, Avalos first examines the principal sub-disciplines of biblical studies (textual criticism, archaeology, historical criticism, literary criticism, biblical theology, and translations) in order to show how these fields are still influenced by religiously motivated agendas despite claims to independence from religious premises. In the second part, he focuses on the infrastructure that supports academic biblical studies to maintain the value of the profession and the Bible. This infrastructure includes academia (public and private universities and colleges), churches, the media-publishing complex, and professional organisations such as the Society of Biblical Literature. In a controversial conclusion, Avalos argues that our world is best served by leaving the Bible as a relic of an ancient civilisation instead of the 'living' document most religionist scholars believe it should be. He urges his colleagues to concentrate on educating the broader society to recognise the irrelevance and even violent effects of the Bible in modern life.
Hector Avalos (Ames, IA) is associate professor of Religious Studies at Iowa State University, the author of four books on biblical studies and religion, the former editor of the Journal for the Critical Study of Religion, and executive director of the Committee for the Scientific Examination of Religion.
Introduction; Translations: Hiding in Plain Sense; Textual Criticism: "The Original Sin"; History and Archaeology: Fields Full of Holes; The Unhistorical Jesus; Literary Criticism: Aesthetics as Apologetics; Biblical Theology: The Pathology of Bibliolatry; Academia: Religionism by Degrees; The Society of Biblical Literature; The Media-Publishing Complex; Conclusion.
"Avalos does deserve credit for not only mentioning the fact that there are plenty of well-respected biblical scholars who defend the general reliability of the bible, but also interacting with their arguments. Other writers who argue against the Bible's reliability usually do not even acknowledge the existence of such individuals. Traditional Christians should return the favor and acknowledge that there are intelligent participants on both sides of the debate." --Restoration Quarterly, 2008 "[Avalos] scores many palpable hits, and should be read by every biblical scholar." --Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, Vol. 32.5, June 2008 "The author suggests that biblical studies should end, and be replaced by a purely secular equivalent. Avalos, whose critique of biblical scholarship parallels that of G. Ludemann, Robert Price and Burton Mack, does have a point." -- International Review of Biblical Studies, Vol. 54, 2007-08
