Michael Mandelstam has provided independent legal training for over 20 years. Prior to this he worked at the Department of Health and, before that, at the Disabled Living Foundation. He has written many legal books on social care and health care matters. He holds postgraduate qualifications in law, information studies and the history of science and medicine.
Preface1.Introduction2.Basic rules and common pitfalls 3.Background, explanation and evidence of a dysfunctional system4.Chapter 4: A-Z ListAdaptations, see Home adaptationsAccommodation and NHS continuing healthcareAdvocacy and NHS continuing healthcareAids to daily living, see EquipmentAltered states of consciousness, see Decision Support ToolAppropriate clinician (end of life)AssessmentBreathing, see Decision Support ToolCare Act 2014CarersCase managementChallenging behaviourChallenging decisionsCharging for services, see Means-testingChecklistChildrenClinical commissioning groupsCognition, see Decision Support ToolCommunication, see Decision Support ToolCompetence, see: Expertise of assessors and knowledge of the patientCommissioning support unitsComplexityConsentConsultation in decision-makingContinence, see Decision Support ToolContinuity of careCoordinatorCooperationCost-effectivenessCoughlan caseDecision-making processDecision support tool (DST)Delay Deprivation of libertyDiagnosisDirect paymentsDiscriminationDispute resolution between NHS and social servicesDisputes between person and the NHSDomains of need, see Decision support toolDouble scoringDowry payments, see Legacy paymentsDrug therapies and medication, see Decision Support ToolEducation, health and care plansEligibility End of life, see Fast track PathwayEquipmentEvidence of need Expertise of assessors, and knowledge of the patientFamily involvement, see: Person and family involvementFast track pathway tool (end of life)Final decisions about CHC eligibility, see Clinical commissioning groupsFinancial gatekeeping, see Final decision-making; ResourcesFunded nursing careGap between health and social care Gatekeeping, see Financial gatekeepingGrogan caseGuidanceHealth care needsHealth Service OmbudsmanHealth services generallyHome adaptationsHospicesHospital dischargeIncidental or ancillary or of a nature beyond social servicesIndependent review panelsIndicative casesInformal carers, see CarersInput (of care)IntensityInterim provision of care during assessment and decisionJoint fundingJoint workingJudicial reviewLearning disabilityLegal frameworkLegal cases, see Indicative casesLegal remedies, see Disputes between person and the NHSLocal authorities, see Social ServicesLocal Government and Social Care Ombudsman (LGSCO) Means-testingMeeting needMental capacityMental health aftercareMental Health Act 1983, see Mental health aftercareMobility, see Decision Support ToolMulti-disciplinary teamNational Framework on NHS Continuing HealthcareNational Health Service Act 2006NatureNHS-employed staffNHS EnglandNorthern IrelandNurse assessorsNutrition, see Decision Support ToolPanelsPaying privately, see Private carePeople's own homesPerson and family involvementPersonal health budgetsPersonal injury compensationPredictable unpredictabilityPointon casePrimary decision makerPrimary health needPrivate top-up careProcess, see Decision makingProfessional judgementProhibitions Psychological and emotional needs, see Decision support toolPublic Service Ombudsman for WalesQuality of care, see NatureQuantity of care, see Incidental or AncillaryReferral for NHS continuing healthcareRegistered nursingRehabilitation and recoveryReimbursementRemedies, see DisputesResourcesRespite careResponsible commissioner, see Clinical commissioning groupsReview of decision about CHC see DisputesReviewing care packageSafeguardingScotlandScreening, see ChecklistSection 117, Mental Health Act, see Mental health after careSettingSkin, see Decision Support ToolSocial careSocial services Specialist staffTimescales, see DelayTopping up, see Private top-up careTrainingTransitionUnpredictabilityWalesWell managed needsWithdrawal of care
This excellent book should be essential reading for the Secretary of State for Health and all health service managers and social workers involved in CHC decision making. It is my hope this book will put the woeful application of CHC decision-making back under the spotlight and into the national conversation.
