In The Ontological Roots of Phenomenology: Rethinking the History of Phenomenology and Its Religious Turn, Anna Jani examines the common methodological background of phenomenology. Through attention to the phenomenon of being, the existential experience of religiosity can be phenomenologically described by the ontological difference between being and beings. Jani demonstrates that the methodological inquiries connect closely with the ontological source of phenomenology. First, she elaborates on the contributions of Hedwig Conrad-Martius, Roman Ingarden, and Edith Stein from the point of view of Heidegger's influence on the early phenomenologists from Husserl's students. Second, she analyzes Heidegger's reinterpretation of his own earlier thinking after the "turn," which is formulated in the idea of the "new beginning of philosophical thinking" in the Contributions to Philosophy. In the context of clarifying the difference between being and beings, her third hypothesis about Ricoeur's critique of Heidegger reveals an ethical level. The primordiality of the ethical dimension of the action reveals the ontological foundation of the hermeneutical-phenomenological situation.
Anna Jani is research fellow and lecturer of philosophy at the Pazmany Peter Catholic University.
Acknowledgements Part 1: Ontological Approaches in Early Phenomenological Thinking First Considerations New Ways in Phenomenological Thinking Part 2: The Experience of Being and the Problem of the Historical Being The Existentiality and Temporality of Dasein The Actuality of the Event and Its Relation to the Temporality of Being Part 3: The Methodological Consequences of the Questioning on Being The Origin of the Ontological Difference The Truth of Beyng and the Truths of Being Part 4: Final Considerations Conclusion Bibliography
"Anna Jani's The Ontological Roots of Phenomenology: Rethinking the History of Phenomenology and Its Religious Turn is a synthesis of traditional scholarship, contemporary philosophy of religion, and open-minded philosophical reasoning. On the complex scene of contemporary phenomenological trends, Anna Jani focuses on the ontological question before and after Edmund Husserl's philosophy. She points out that phenomenologies of religion-from Adolf Reinach through Edith Stein to Paul Ricoeur-underpinned various efforts to reestablish the ontological commitment of phenomenology. Hermeneutics appears in this context as the method of finding the ontological roots of phenomenology from Dilthey to Dan Zahavi. With her fresh and deep work Anna Jani continues her explorations of the varieties of religious experience and assists the reader with new motivations to continue this path of research. Her overarching understanding of the history and the problems of phenomenology and hermeneutics helps the readers understand the contemporary philosophical situation in and beyond Continental Thought." -- Balazs M. Mezei, Corvinus University "The book begins with Paul Ricouer's hermeneutics and has its conclusion in it. In the middle we find the description of the main thinkers in early phenomenology: Edmund Husserl, Edith Stein, and Hedwig Conrad-Martius on one side, and Martin Heidegger on the other side. To the latter, the author dedicates her major reflections, being her pivotal argument the question of ontology. In this way a path is sketched that leads from the 'classic' phenomenology to hermeneutics. Along this path many important aspects of the thinkers are pinpointed; the book is useful to understand the different senses in which phenomenology can be considered." -- Angela Ales Bello, Pontifical Lateran University "This book discusses the relationship between phenomenology and the question of being as it unfolded among the protagonists of the early phenomenological movement. By doing so three thinkers become visible as important for understanding the polarization between Husserlian and Heideggerian versions, namely Hedwig Conrad-Martius, Roman Ingarden, and Edith Stein. The upshot is a much better grasp of what the question of being in fact involves and thus also of phenomenology and of the phenomenological tradition. It is a very intelligent book bound to mark the debate in coming years." -- Mette Lebech, Maynooth University
