The Queer Bookishness of Romanticism

A fresh and provocative rereading of Romanticism's literary culture, Robinson's book offers a set of fascinating forays into a "bookish underside" constituted by affective attachments to the material book object. Demonstrating how such attachments both dislodged idealizing categories within the literary sphere and underwrote the formation of dissident communities within the culture of literacy, Robinson opens up a new dimension of anxieties over books, reading and authorship in the period.--Ina Ferris, University of Ottawa In this carefully researched, stylish study, Michael Robinson traces the controversies that the cult of the rare book occasioned in nineteenth-century literary culture. The nineteenth century's canonical notions of author and public were challenged when the ornamental gentlemen of the era - collectors, dandies, flaneurs - performed in their campy way their attachment to books and to the material stuff of books especially. Romanticists, scholars of collecting and consumerism, and historians of gender and sexuality will all learn a lot from Robinson's recovery of the understudied connections between bibliophilia and dissident eroticism.--Deidre Shauna Lynch, Harvard University Michael Robinson's The Queer Bookishness of Romanticism is a welcome exploration of the homoerotic overlay of the culture of book collecting that expanded dramatically during the Romantic period. As Robinson shows, the pleasures of bookishness were often marked as queer even when they were not explicitly gay. His chapters on the Ladies of Llangollen, Thomas Dibdin, Charles Lamb, and the forgers Wise and Buxton Forman provide a vivid counter to the heterosexism at the center of so much Romantic scholarship.--Andrew Elfenbein, University of Minnesota Ornamental Community is a brilliant and wide-ranging study of the relationship of English romanticism to what could be called "bookish consumerism" or the "dissident culture of bookishness" of the 19th c., centering on what appears to be the perhaps inadvertent democratization of such consumerism through Thomas Frognall Dibdin, if not the most "curious" thinker of this period, surely its queerest stylistician.--Joseph A. Dane, Professor of English, University of Southern California