Since 1815 democratic states have emerged victorious from most wars, leading many scholars to conclude that democracies are better- equipped to triumph in armed conflict with autocratic and other non-representative governments. Political scientist Michael C. Desch argues that the evidence and logic of that supposition, which he terms democratic triumphalism, are as flawed as the arguments for the opposite belief that democracies are inherently disadvantaged in international relations. He finds that the problems that persist in prosecuting warsfrom building up and maintaining public support to holding the military and foreign policy elites in checkremain constant regardless of any given state's form of government. In assessing the record, he finds that military effectiveness is almost wholly reliant on the material assets that a state possesses and is able to mobilize.