Romantic Rocks, Aesthetic Geology

Noah Heringman is Associate Professor of English at the University of Missouri-Columbia. He is the editor of Romantic Science: The Literary Forms of Natural History.

"A fascinating study of the rocks of Romanticism, the geology of German and British thinking that flowed out from the field work of early hammer-toting scientists into the libraries, the natural history museums, and the scientific 'cabinets' of Europe... Noah Heringman has written an important work of literary criticism that does justice to the term 'interdisciplinary' by uniting literary scholarship with the wider sweep of scientific history... It should be required reading for all professors and graduate students of Romanticism, in the widest sense of that word."-Ashton Nichols, Nineteenth-Century Contexts, December 2006 "In Romantic Rocks, Aesthetic Geology, Noah Heringman presents superb evidence that Romantic poets made intriguing use of geological distinctions. His point is not that these poets echo or allude to geological terms, but that their invocation of geological ideas belongs to the deep structure of poetic arguments. For instance, he shows decisively how visual, dramatic, and geological notices of volcanic eruption were parallel in Romantic culture for revolution from below. With a brilliant array of evidence, Heringman shows how natural history and geology operated in the Romantic public sphere."-Theresa M. Kelley, University of Wisconsin-Madison "Noah Heringman's writing is unfailingly graceful, pertinent, and well documented. He ranges easily among poets such as William Blake, John Keats, Percy Shelley, and William Wordsworth, but also among scientists and geologists, including Erasmus Darwin, Humphry Davy, James Hutton, and John Whitehurst."-Stuart Peterfreund, Northeastern University "Romantic Rocks, Aesthetic Geology is absorbing, eye-opening, and essential reading for anyone working in Romanticism and its relation to other disciplines. It is a rich exploration of Romanticism and natural history and exemplary as a method of treating the dialectical relation of literature and science with nuance and gratifying complexity. It's solidly grounded in history of science and cultural history, yet poses the question of aesthetics and literary form acutely as well. The book's supple movements among various languages of knowledge make it a true model of cross-disciplinary critical writing and historical argument."-Jon Klancher, Carnegie Mellon University