The Practice of Satire in England, 1658-1770

Preface
Acknowledgments
A Note on Texts, Dates, and Money
1. Canonical and Noncanonical Satire, 1658–1770
I. The ""Definition"" Quagmire and the Problem of Descriptive Terminology
II. Genre versus Mode
III. The Modern Critical Canon and Its Implications
IV. The Total Satire Canon and Its Economic Context
The Production of Satire in England, 1658–1770
Price, Format, Dissemination, and Implied Audiences
V. Some Issues of Coverage and Organization
VI. The Uses of a Taxonomic Methodology
The Varieties of Satire
Forecasting Some Conclusions
The Nature of the Enterprise
2. Contemporary Views on Satire, 1658–1770
I. Concepts of Satire
""Satire""
Definition by Contrast
II. The Business of Satire
The Opposition to Satire
The Case for Satire
III. The Practice and Province of Satire
Acceptable and Problematical Satiric Methods
Appropriate and Inappropriate Satiric Targets
IV. Characterizing the Satirist
V. Perceptions of Eighteenth-Century Satire Then and Now
3. Satire in the Carolean Period
I. Some Preliminary Considerations
II. Dryden, Rochester, Buckingham
Carolean Dryden
Rochester
Buckingham's Purposive Satire
III. Marvell, Ayloffe, Oldham
Marvell as Polemical Satirist
Ayloffe's Antimonarchical Diatribes
Oldham's Juvenalian Performances
IV. Hudibras and Other Camouflage Satires
V. Personal and Social Satire: From Lampoons to Otway and Lee
VI. Chronological Change, 1658–1685
VII. Issues
Intensity
Tone
Presentation of Positives
The Problem of Application
VIII. The Discontinuous World of Carolean Satire
4. Beyond Carolean
I. Altered Circumstances
II. Dryden as Satirist, 1685–1700
III. Poetic Satire
Tutchin, Defoe, and Political Satire
Gould and Defamatory Satire
Garth and Blackmore
Brown, Ward, and Commercial Satire
IV. Dramatic Satire
Shadwell and Exemplary Comedy
Mitigated Satire
Harsh Social Satire
V. The State of Satire ca. 1700
5. Defoe, Swift, and New Varieties of Satire, 1700–1725
I. Defoe as Satirist
Attack and Defense
Instruction and Direct Warning (Aimed at the Audience)
Indirect Exposure and Discomfiture
II. Religious and Political Satire
Topical Controversy
Monitory Satire in the Manner of Defoe
Ideological Argumentation: Dunton, Defoe, and Others
III. Social and Moral Satire
Generalized Satire
Didactic Satire in the Manner of Steele
Particularized and Topical Satire
Argument and Inquiry
IV. The Alleged ""Scriblerians""
V. Swift before Gulliver
Jokiness and Play
Destruction and Negativity
Purposive Defamation and Defense
Indirection and Difficult Satire
VI. Characterizing the Early Eighteenth Century
6. Harsh and Sympathetic Satire, 1726–1745
I. Pope and Swift among Their Contemporaries
Political Commentary and Combat
The Culture Wars
Social Satire
II. Pope, Swift, Gay
Pope
Swift
Gay
III. The Problem of Meaning in Gulliver's Travels
IV. Fielding and the Move toward Sympathetic Satire
Playful Satire and Entertainment
Provocation and Preachment
Distributive Justice
Fielding's Concept of Satire
Sympathetic Satire
V. Alive and Well
7. Churchill, Foote, Macklin, Garrick, Smollett, Sterne, and Others, 1745–1770
I. The Rise of ""Poetic"" Satire
Frivolity and Entertainment
Moral Preachment
Particularized Attack
Poeticized Satire
Churchill's Nonpolitical Satire
II. Wilkes, Churchill, and Political Controversy in the 1760s
The North Briton
Churchill's Political Satire
Visual Satire
Wilkes's Essay on Woman
III. Satire in the Commercial Theater
Social Comedy
Lightweight Afterpiece Entertainment
Samuel Foote
Charles Macklin
David Garrick
IV. Satire in the Mid-Eighteenth-Century Novel
Smollett's Dark Satire
The Late Career of Fielding
Tristram Shandy and the Singularity of Sterne
Charlotte Lennox, Oliver Goldsmith, Sarah Fielding
V. Satire for a Stable Era
Epilogue
I. Motives and Modes
II. Remapping English Satire, 1658–1770
Appendix
Notes
Bibliography
Index

""Broadening the notion of satire to include more works, more kinds of works, and a wider range of satirical motives and effects, [Marshall] offers an account of eighteenth-century literature more amenable to contemporary sensibilities than those of previous proponents and detractors of satire.""