Tewodros Workneh is assistant professor of global communication at the School of Communication Studies, Kent State University. Paul Haridakis is professor of communication studies at Kent State University.
Request Academic Copy
Please copy the ISBN for submitting review copy form
Description
Table of Contents PART I: Introduction Counter-terrorism Laws in the International frame: Uncertain Times for Freedom of Expression Tewodros Workneh & Paul Haridakis PART II: The Politics and Discourse of Counterterrorism Laws 2. Schizorevolutions versus Microfascisms: The Fear of Anarchy in State Securitization Athina Karatzogianni & Andrew Robinson 3. Parliamentary Discussion of Counter-terrorism in Portugal: Discourses on the Right and on the Left Eunice Castro Seixas 4. Anti-terrorism Regulations and Freedom of Speech in Spain Isabel Serrano Maillo 5. Counter-terrorism Gone Digital: Framing Cybercrime in Turkey Nazli Bu lay Dogan 6. Chinese-Speaking Netizens' Comments on VOA's Coverage of China's Counter-Terrorism Laws and Freedom of Speech Wei Sun 7. Terrorism and Counter-terrorism legislation in Brazil Daniel Oppermann 8. How 9/11 Changed America and How We (can) Talk about It: Torture and the Guantanamo Military Commissions Rita Radostitz PART III: Counter-Terrorism Laws and Journalistic Practice 9. Journalism on Ice-National Security Laws and The Chilling Effect in Australian Journalism Richard Murray, Rebecca Ananian-Welsh & Peter Greste 10. Anti-terrorism Regulation and Journalism Practice in Uganda Florence Namasinga Selnes 11. Between Voice and Silence: India's Counter-terrorism Laws and Self-Censorship of Journalists in the Kashmir Conflict Mohammad Imran Parray 12. Investigative Journalism and Counter-terrorism Law in Cameroon Ngangum Peter Tiako PART IV: Counter-Terrorism Laws and Citizen Expression 13. Peru's Counter-Terrorism Law in Post-Conflict Times Gabriela Martinez 14. Extremism: Russia's Crackdown on Free Speech and Religious Freedom in the Name of National Security Daniel Ortner 15. Confronting "The Other": Internal Constraints on Freedom of Speech to Combat Perceived External Threats Paul Haridakis 16. Terrorism Law System in Algeria: To Serve and Protect or to Control and Oppress? Francesco Tamburini 17. Counter-terrorism and Freedom of Speech in Ethiopia: The EPRDF Years Tewodros Workneh 18. Instrument to Rule? Examining the Impact of Bangladesh's Counter-terrorism Laws on Freedom of Expression Shudipta Sharma PART V: Epilogue 19. Epilogue: Insights and Lessons Learned or Confirmed Paul Haridakis & Tewodros Workneh
"An impressive contribution to the comparative and multi-disciplinary study of counter-terrorism and its effects. This book examines a broad range of jurisdictions from throughout the globe and drills down on how growing counter-terrorism laws too often shrink the space available for free expression." -- Kent Roach, University of Toronto "The global reach of the critiques and analyses in Counter-Terrorism Laws and Freedom of Expression make this book a crucial new tool for the interrogation of dangerous threats to free speech worldwide. Tewodros Workneh and Paul Haridakis seamlessly weave representative studies from a diverse array of experts and locales to show that, no matter the system, all governments seek the cover of terrorism to rationalize self-interested censorship. A primary - and sobering - text across disciplines, from political science to international studies to journalism and beyond." -- Peter Laufer, University of Oregon "The main contribution of this book is the reflection on the ways democratic and non-democratic states deals with the threat of external and internal terrorism using counter-terrorism as their legal machinery. The book sheds light on a wide spectrum of the risks counter-terrorism poses to democratic values such as freedom of expression by showing the difficulties to maintain this right in times of combating terrorism. The book indicates strongly what happens when states are using anti-terrorism acts without strong judicial review by the courts. Without due balances between the needs of security and preservation of freedom of expression we are depriving our citizens from having a fair report about security operations and the risks involved in the lives of media personnel." -- Emanuel Gross, University of Haifa